Music — September 10, 2013 11:14 — 3 Comments

One Super-Important Question For Evan Flory-Barnes

Evan Flory-Barnes is a Seattle musician. When he walks into a club, say, The Seamonster Lounge, he is greeted by dozens of people, often being affectionately called “The Mayor”. He plays double bass in jazz groups, hip-hop groups, rock groups. He has a charming smile and cares deeply about the city of Seattle, where he was born and raised. The Monarch Review had a chance to catch up with Evan and ask him one super-important question.

 

Jake Uitti: What do you think Seattle needs to recognize as it begins a new era of influencing the arts on a world stage?

Evan Flory-Barnes: Seattle must recognize, own and celebrate its quality on every level as a city of creativity, innovation and individual self-expression. This has to be done free from irony, self-deprecation and unhealthy and immature ideas of competition. Seattle is coming into its own self-hood and actualization. It is coming out of a period of prolonged adolescence, academic agoraphobia, reverence for self-sabotage and the dismissal of success that fuels the tired crabs in the barrel mentality. I look at the success of Macklemore as a very positive thing and I believe that the embrace of him whether you dig his music or not on the community level is essential to everyone’s possibility in whatever successes they dream of. His fans here clearly embrace him but I believe this city’s creative class should embrace him as an avenue of possibility, even a study in self-branding and creating a depth of relationship with your audience. To me, it reveals a type of complicated laziness from those who want to reduce his impact and contribution to the world stage as mere appropriation or commodity when an artist’s two most successful songs are about marriage equality and thrift shopping. This speaks to radical changes that are happening in our cultural mainstream that our region brings into the forefront. I believe that the progressive bubble in our city can often dismiss things that have significance on a larger stage and in doing so we devalue and ex-out our very unique, necessary and groundbreaking perspective to the discussion. This is why artists do well when they leave the town. A unique voice is cultivated and then its uniqueness is amplified and appreciated. Why not just amplify and appreciate it HERE.

But then there’s always the question of how? Before I elaborate on the how let me share what I feel is possible in this city. I believe that Seattle can/is becoming an Artistic Cultural Community unprecedented. An environment in which the public and private sector, artists, audiences, curators and venue owners co-create an environment that buoys all artists independent of genre or discipline. Sound like a utopia? Maybe. But utopian visions often attempt to erase individuality and personal distinction. I feel in this environment the convergence of unique and even divergent perspectives is key.

But more important than the convergence of perspectives is creating as many performances, presentations, workshops, discussions, gatherings that both show and tackle ignored questions as well as illuminate the idea that everything we need for a flourishing artistic/cultural community is already here. There is no lack in talent, skill, imagination and space in Seattle. Last year the town spent close to half a billion dollars on the arts. We have more millionaires per capita than anyone in the country and I believe that a shift in the mentality of artists, musicians, curators and venue owners needs to move from scarcity to the idea of abundance. From hoarding to collaboration and a healthy and fun sense of competition with the overarching intention of showing off that the Seattle Artistic/Cultural production is of the highest quality at every level and in doing so it will become the city’s chief attraction, export and identity.

Bio:

3 Comments

  1. I can’t really speak to the viabiity of Seattle as a breeding ground for new bands or a new sound. But looking back in time, the closing of the jazz spots on South Jackson after WW II aborted Seattle as a venue for the then burgeneoning be-bop. Thus, as long as there are clubs for all kinds of music – yet I don’t think music is especially city specific any more, although it does require a city and audiences and their response. And all of this, mind you, is music for the young, or the forever young.

    In other respects, say of theater, Seattle is not viable, for lack of a large enough sophisticated and hungry audience. The impetus of the 60s and 70s and the small theaters that were founded then has died out. I would say, after 20 years in this neck of the woods, that what perpetuates itself and will forever is provinciality, the general protestant ethos and the weight of the commercialized culture is too great, the few exceptions prove the rule. Lack of critics and critics with the proper tools – but why would they even bother to go against the general tide here and be worn out?

  2. Bravo Evan,

    Your below comment holds a special degree of truth in my personal experience as a filmmaker:

    “I believe that the progressive bubble in our city can often dismiss things that have significance on a larger stage and in doing so we devalue and ex-out our very unique, necessary and groundbreaking perspective to the discussion.”

    We created a critically acclaimed television mini-series and theatrical length motion picture that elevated not only Seattle jazz artists but those of national and international significance. “Icons Among Us: jazz in the present tense” was hailed by outlets from the LA Times to the Huffington Post to the New York Times to Downbeat Magazine to the Utne Reader along with positive user reviews from Amazon, iTunes and Netflix. Yet despite SIFF’s support of the world premiere of the feature film (for full disclosure I was a member of the board at that time) in the 2010 festival, nary a bit of interest came our way from the local press. When our publicist (New York based) pitched the local news & cultural press outlets their response went something like “there are just so many movies.” The physics of the Seattle arts ecosystem needs to experience an evolutionary progression away from the isolationism of the past. Your urgings fall upon our ready ears that will continue without pause to advance new ideas based on the sanctity of inspiration. The future is as bright as we make it, so let’s just do it again…

  3. Steve Griggs says:

    Positivity breeds positivity and vice versa. We have a long history of local talent finding their unique voices. We don’t need experts that mediate between artists and audiences. We do need advocates like EFB to drown out critics spouting consumer protection. We need artists taking more risks, finding unexpected venues and engaging new audiences.

Leave a Reply

The answer isn't poetry, but rather language

- Richard Kenney